2021/23

Pathogen flows from sanitation systems in Dhaka: A quantitative environmental assessment

4 Poster Track: Applied Research » 4 Health, safety and hygiene

Speaker: Nuhu Amin


Summary – for publication in conference brochure:


 

There is limited field-based evidence on removal of pathogens from septic tanks and decentralised systems. In a low-income area in Dhaka, we investigated pathogen loads (Shigella, S.Typhi, V.cholerae, Norovirus, and Giardia) associated with sanitation systems using qPCR including in effluent, open-drains and waterways. These pathogens were detected with high frequency (particularly Norovirus, V.cholerae and Shigella), and at potentially unsafe concentrations of pathogens in most of the environmental samples except for S.Typhi. The exposure pathways to children and adults make these findings of high concern, and the results will be important to prompt rethinking in how to achieve safe sanitation solutions.

 


Introduction, methods, results and discussion:


 

Introduction: Despite the recent success in reducing open defecation, environmental contamination with fecal pathogens still remain a widespread health and environmental hazard that needs to be addressed among many developing countries including Bangladesh. Recent evidence suggested that both urban and rural environments are contaminated; though use of Fecal Indicator Bacteria (FIB) as a reference [1] and detection of faecal pathogens. There is limited information available on the removal of pathogens from septic tanks and the faecal pathogen loads with septic tanks and Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (ABR). Detecting disease causing pathogens from environmental sources is also challenging and expensive [2]. To generate evidence, we conducted a cross-sectional study to explore pathogen loads from commonly used onsite sanitation systems (i.e., septic tank, ABR) and nearby drains and waterways in urban neighbourhoods of Dhaka.

 

 

 

Methods: We collected samples of drain water (400mL grab and 20L for ultrafiltration), drain sediment, canal water (400mL grab and 20L for ultrafiltration) and floodwater (400mL grab and 20L for ultrafiltration) from April-October 2019. Sludge, supernatant, and effluent samples were also collected from septic tanks and anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). We investigated the presence and concentration of E. coli [most probable number (MPN) using the IDEXX- Quanti-tray® 2000 technique with Colilert-24 media] [1,2] and selected enteric pathogens (Shigella, Vibrio cholerae (V. cholerae), Salmonella Typhi (S. Typhi), Norovirus Genogroup-II (NoV-GII),and Giardia) and presence of Cryptosporidium in these samples using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).The equivalent genome copies (EGC) of individual pathogen were estimated in each sample by interpolation of the mean Ct value to the corresponding standard curve and the dilution factor for each sample type. Absolute quantification was expressed as log10 EGC per 100mL for the water samples and log10 EGC per gram for the sediment samples.

 

 

Results and discussion: All environmental samples (100%) were highly contaminated with E. coli. The highest E. coli concentrations were detected in canal ultrafiltration samples [8.79 log10 MPN/100mL] and lowest detected in flood grab samples [5.23 log10 MPN/100mL]. The concentration of E. coli was significantly higher in ABR samples compared to septic tanks [log10 mean difference ABR minus septic tank samples for sludge=1.91 (95% CI: 1.19-2.65), supernatant=2.04 (95% CI: 1.54-2.54) and effluent=1.12 (95% CI: 0.39-1.86)], which may be due to significant overloading of the ABR systems. For pathogen analysis, the fieldworkers collected 40 grab samples, 37 ultrafiltration samples, 40 septic tank and 22 ABR samples. Among all samples tested (N=150), about 89% were contaminated with Shigella, 68% with V. cholerae and NoV-GII, 31% with Giardia, 17% with S. Typhi and 6% with Cryptosporidium. A wide range of concentration of pathogens [range: mean log10 concentration of Giardia=0.74 EGC/100 mL in drain ultrafiltration samples to mean log10 concentration of NoV-GII and Giardia=7.11 EGC/100mL in ABR sludge] was found in all environmental samples. Highest pathogen concentrations were detected in open drains [range: mean log10 concentration=2.50-4.94 EGC/100mL], septic tank effluent [range: mean log10 concentration=3.32-4.65 EGC/100mL] and ABR effluent [range: mean log10 concentration=2.72-5.13 EGC/100mL].


Conclusions and implications:


 

Conclusions and Implications: In Dhaka, Bangladesh, we detected high frequency and concentrations of V.cholerae, S.Typhi and NoV-GII in effluent from community-scale ABRs and septic-tanks which subsequently entered open drains and waterways and may present a risk of exposure to children and adults in this and/or and downstream communities. Given what is known about the infectivity of five target pathogens we examined, the concentrations of these pathogens detected in the environmental samples are of significant concern and raise questions about appropriate implementation of on-site sanitation systems in dense urban areas. Revised approaches to select and implement appropriate on-site sanitation technologies should take into account low-pathogen removal and potential exposure pathways through drains, groundwater, and surface water [4]. In addition, increased focus on appropriate management and maintenance of sanitation systems and appropriate behaviour change messages both for the community and implementers are crucial. Future studies should assess changes in pathogen exposure associated with specific sanitation interventions and consider the health-impacts of environmental contamination among high-income and low-income communities in Dhaka city. Further studies and guidance are needed to improve urban planning, current septic-tank and ABR design criteria, and operation and maintenance practices, to achieve safe and sustainable sanitation services [5].

 


Relevant references:


1. Amin
N.
Rahman
M.
Raj
S.
Ali
S.
Green
J.
Das
S.
. . . Moe
C. L. (2019) Quantitative assessment of fecal contamination in multiple environmental sample types in urban communities in Dhaka
Bangladesh using SaniPath microbial approach. PLOS ONE
14(12)
e0221193.
2. Raj
S.J.
Wang
Y.
Yakubu
H.
Robb
K.
Siesel
C.
Green
J.
Kirby
A.
Mairinger
W.
Michiel
J.
Null
C.
Perez
E.
Roguski
K.
Moe
C.L.
2020 The SaniPath Exposure Assessment Tool: A quantitative approach for assessing exposure to fecal contamination through multiple pathways in low resource urban settlements. PLOS ONE 15
e0234364.
3. Ramírez-Castillo
F. Y.
Loera-Muro
A.
Jacques
M.
Garneau
P.
Avelar-González
F. J.
Harel
J.
& Guerrero-Barrera
A. L. (2015) Waterborne pathogens: detection methods and challenges. Pathogens (Basel
Switzerland)
4(2)
307-334.
4. Mills
F.
Willetts
J.
Petterson
S.
Mitchell
C.
Norman
G.
2018. Faecal Pathogen Flows and Their Public Health Risks in Urban Environments: A Proposed Approach to Inform Sanitation Planning. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15
181.
5. Schrecongost
A.
Pedi
D.
Rosenboom
J. W.
Shrestha
R.
Ban
R.
2020. Citywide Inclusive Sanitation: A Public Service Approach for Reaching the Urban Sanitation SDGs. Frontiers in Environmental Science 8
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00019

Download Attachment